Opinion

Laszkow v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Dec 1, 2021
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Brian H. Corcoran
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1524V

UNPUBLISHED

STEPHANIE LASZKOW, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: October 26, 2021

v.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder

Injury Related to Vaccine

Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On October 2, 2019, Stephanie Laszkow filed a petition for compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on

September 21, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 17, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to

compensation for SIRVA. On October 25, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award of

compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $55,000.00, which is

comprised of damages for pain and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic

Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from

public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012).

represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a

whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump

sum payment of $55,000.00 (comprised of damages for pain and suffering) in the

form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all

damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

STEPHANIE LASZKOW,

Petitioner, No. 19-1524V

Chief Special Master Corcoran

v. SPU

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Procedural History and Items of Compensation

On May 17, 2021, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, and concededed that

entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Thereafter, on

that same day, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner

was entitled to vaccine compensation for her right Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (“SIRVA”). Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner

should be awarded $55,000.00, which is comprised of damages for pain and suffering. This

amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through

a lump sum payment of $55,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner

1

Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court

for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings

and future pain and suffering.

agrees.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Acting Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO

Acting Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN

Deputy Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

ALEXIS B. BABCOCK

Assistant Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

s/ Mallori B. Openchowski

MALLORI B. OPENCHOWSKI

Trial Attorney

Torts Branch, Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, DC 20044-0146

Tel.: (202) 305-0660

mallori.b.openchowski@usdoj.gov

DATED: October 25, 2021

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.