zoning ordinance governing intensity of airport use, required take-off distance, set back requirements, and type of flight not preempted by Noise Control Act because not related to noise control or the use of navigable airspace
How later courts described this case
- zoning ordinance governing intensity of airport use, required take-off distance, set back requirements, and type of flight not preempted by Noise Control Act because not related to noise control or the use of navigable airspace
- the court upheld a local ordinance regulating take-off distance, setbacks, types of flights, and intensity of airport use, holding that it was not preempted by the Noise Control Act
- county restrictions .on size and scope of private airfield not preempted
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
859 F.2d 149
Anderson (Charles M.)
v.
Mackall (Henry C.), Mackall, Mackall, Walker & Silver,
Donald L. Bowman, Law Office, Bach (F. Bruce),
Stevens (Jack B.), Brown (J. Howe),
Fortkort (Thomas A.), Hilton (Claude)
NO. 87-2176
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
SEP 20, 1988
1
Appeal From: E.D.Va.
2
AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART.
3
Decisions Without Reported Opinions' appearing in the Federal Reporter. The Fourth Circuit provides by rule that an opinion will not be published unless it meets specific criteria, and further provides that citation of unpublished dispositions is 'disfavored.' Fourth Circuit Rules, I.O.P. 36.4, 36.6, 28 U.S.C.A.)