Opinion

Pedraza v. Circuit Court of Drew County

  • 426 S.W.3d 441
  • 2013 Ark. 116
  • 2013 Ark. LEXIS 130
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Mar 14, 2013
Status
Published
Author
Hart
On the bench
Hart, Hoofman
Cited by
8 cases

The opinion

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice, concurring.

I reaffirm the majority’s acknowledgment that “death is different” and echo the court’s call for rule changes to reflect defense counsel’s need for adequate time to prepare a defense, discover mitigating evidence, and rebut aggravating evidence. In recognition of this difference, court rules require that Indefense counsel meet certain educational requirements in death-penalty postconviction proceedings, Ark. R.Crim. P. 37.5(c)(1)(D), and the Arkansas Public Defender Commission has promulgated rules requiring that defense counsel in death-penalty cases annually complete continuing legal education concerning defense of capital cases, 060-00-002 Ark. Code R. § (A)(6) & (B)(2)(d) (Weil 2000). Circuit courts, prosecutors, and State appellate counsel should meet similar educational requirements so that they, too, will recognize the specific demands of death-penalty cases, such as understanding that defense counsel needs sufficient time to prepare, as required by due process under the Fourteenth Amendment and the safeguard of effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.