Opinion

Harris v. Johnson

  • 2011 Ark. App. 243
  • 383 S.W.3d 409
  • 2011 Ark. App. LEXIS 246
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Mar 30, 2011
Status
Published
Author
Gladwin
On the bench
Abramson, Agree, Gladwin, Glover, Hoofman, Martin, Vaught
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 21.5%

The opinion

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge, concurring.

I concur that this case must be affirmed, but believe that it must be affirmed under the law-of-the-case doctrine. I agree with Chief Judge Vaught’s analysis that Harris was protected from the tort suit by Ark. Code Ann. § ll-9-105(a) (Repl.2002). However, our court held otherwise. See Johnson v. Ark. Steel Erectors, 2009 Ark. App. 755 , 350 S.W.3d 801 . Therefore, we are bound by that decision under the law-of-the-case doctrine. See Green v. George’s Farms, Inc., 2011 Ark. 70 , 378 S.W.3d 715 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.