Opinion

Poff v. Peedin

  • 366 S.W.3d 347
  • 2010 Ark. 136
  • 2010 Ark. LEXIS 164
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Mar 18, 2010
Status
Published
Author
Danielson
On the bench
Danielson, Hannah, Sheffield
Cited by
19 cases

answering certified question regarding appropriate standard of review

How later courts described this case

  • answering certified question regarding appropriate standard of review

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DANIELSON, J., concurring.

I concur. The clearly-erroneous standard set forth in Ark. R. Civ. P. 52(a) is the standard applied to bench trials, not necessarily to all declaratory-judgment actions. This is because a declaratory-judgment action is often times reviewed on appeal by the standard of review applicable to the underlying basis for the action, as evidenced by those cases cited by the majority. In other words, while the matter underlying an appeal may be an action for declaratory judgment, the actual standard of review shall be determined, as it is in any case, by the issue actually presented. Thus, there is no blanket standard of review to be applied to all declaratory-judgment actions. Instead, the appellate court should determine the issue presented in the appeal and, then, determine the applicable and appropriate standard of review. See, e.g., 5 C.J. S. Appeal & Error § 888 (2009) (“The selection of the appropriate standard of appellate review requires a correct characterization of the trial court proceedings.”).

HANNAH, C.J., joins.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.