Opinion

Bray v. Tejas Toyota, Inc.

  • 363 S.W.3d 777
  • 2012 WL 370571
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
Feb 2, 2012
Status
Published
Author
Henson
On the bench
Henson, Jones, Pemberton
Cited by
8 cases

“[T]he Division adopted the ALJ’s determination that ‘bad faith is not simply bad judgment or negligence, but the conscious doing of a wrong for a dishonest, discriminatory or malicious purpose . . . .’”

How later courts described this case

  • “[T]he Division adopted the ALJ’s determination that ‘bad faith is not simply bad judgment or negligence, but the conscious doing of a wrong for a dishonest, discriminatory or malicious purpose . . . .’”
  • noting importance of difference in adjacent statutory language

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DIANE M. HENSON, Justice,

concurring.

I concur in the judgment and reasoning of the majority opinion, with the exception of the discussion of the statutory duty of *788 good faith and fair dealing found in footnote eleven. Because we need not address the applicability of the statutory duty of good faith and fair dealing to dispose of the appeal, I decline to join footnote eleven of the majority opinion. See Tex.R.App. P. 47. 1 (courts of appeals must hand down written opinion that is brief as practicable but that addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of appeal).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.