Opinion

State v. Boyd

  • 909 S.W.2d 50
  • 1995 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 522
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Filed
Jun 28, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Hayes
On the bench
Attached, Hayes, Peay, Summers
Cited by
9 cases

holding that both factors (10) and (16) may be applied when someone other than the victim is in the area and subject to injury

How later courts described this case

  • holding that both factors (10) and (16) may be applied when someone other than the victim is in the area and subject to injury
  • where stated failed to offer any evidence of deliberate and premeditated nature of attempted homicide, presumption applied that attempted unlawful killing was attempted second-degree murder
  • insufficient proof of premeditation and deliberation where defendant “reached her boiling point” with the victim’s sexual harrassment of her and went to her car to retrieve gun before shooting, but not killing, the victim

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HAYES, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with my colleagues’ conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to establish the elements of attempted first-degree murder. However, under the facts presented at trial and found by the majority, I would conclude that the appellant is guilty of attempted voluntary manslaughter rather than attempted second-degree murder.

The distinction between voluntary manslaughter and second-degree murder is that voluntary manslaughter requires that the killing resulted from a state of passion produced by adequate provocation sufficient to lead a reasonable person to act in an irrational manner. See Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-210, 211(a) (1991). The majority explicitly concludes that the appellant committed the offense “in a fit of passion and with a hot temper.” I agree with this conclusion and would furthermore conclude that the appellant’s state of passion was produced by adequate provocation, which would lead a reasonable person to act in an irrational manner. I would find that the appellant’s reason was obscured and that her act was the result of impulse, based upon the demeaning and taunting nature of the conduct involved, coupled with its longstanding duration. I therefore conclude that the appellant is guilty of criminal attempt to commit voluntary manslaughter, not the offense of criminal attempt to commit second-degree murder.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.