Opinion

Ingram v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

  • 876 S.W.2d 91
  • 1994 Tenn. LEXIS 92
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 21, 1994
Status
Published
On the bench
Anderson, Brien, Daughtrey, Drowota, Reid
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

Defendants have filed a dignified and appropriate petition for rehearing in which they aver that the Court’s opinion overlooks, misapprehends and incorrectly states material facts established by the evidence.

Defendant’s concern relates to the Court’s reference to an affidavit by Dr. Ronald Cherry which was inadvertently omitted from the appellate record and subsequently included by stipulation.

The Court’s judgment was based on the evidence contained in the record and the applicable Workers’ Compensation Statutes and not the stipulation of the defendants to the accuracy of the contents of Dr. Cherry’s affidavit.

The petition to rehear is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.