Opinion

Nueces County Appraisal District v. Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co.

  • 853 S.W.2d 212
  • 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 1212
  • 1993 WL 132593
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
Apr 29, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Dorsey
On the bench
Seerden, Dorsey, Bissett, Nye, Kennedy
Cited by
6 cases

“We conclude that once the purposes of the Import-Export Clauses ... have been satisfied ... the concept of ‘in transit’ loses any rational meaning.”

How later courts described this case

  • “We conclude that once the purposes of the Import-Export Clauses ... have been satisfied ... the concept of ‘in transit’ loses any rational meaning.”
  • “Clearly, this nondiscriminatory tax passes this test because the taxing state only taxed that property which was present within its boundaries and received governmental services regardless of its origin or its destination.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DORSEY, Justice,

concurring.

I join in the well-written majority opinion authored by Justice Seerden. I write to express my analysis of the case, because I do not believe the following issue is illuminated by the exegesis of the dissent.

Both the Import-Export Clause and the Commerce Clause of the federal constitution prohibit a state from levying a duty on goods passing through that state, when those goods originate from and are destined for a foreign land or sister state. If the goods are merely “passing through” bound for another jurisdiction, they are in transit and not subject to the local state’s taxation.

The oil at issue was produced abroad, transported by ship until unloaded into the terminal at Harbor Island, located in Nuec-es County, Texas. The oil will be transported from there by pipeline to a refinery in Live Oak County, Texas, where it will be refined and transformed into gasoline and other products. There is no assertion that the resulting gasoline and related products will be transported from Texas to be consumed elsewhere. The oil is owned by Diamond Shamrock at all relevant times.

The issue in the present case is whether the State of Texas may tax the oil in the storage tanks in Nueces County. The issue is not which taxing entity within the State of Texas is the proper taxing agency. The Import-Export and Commerce Clauses are restrictions on the State vis-a-vis the Federal Government. If the goods sought to be taxed cease being in transit within the state, the State may impose non-discriminatory ad valorem taxes.

The power of the State to tax being at issue, it is not important where within the state the material finally comes to rest and ceases to be in transit. It is immaterial for federal constitutional purposes that the final destination of the imported crude oil is Nueces County or Live Oak County, Texas. If the State of Texas has jurisdiction to tax, a dispute regarding which taxing authority within the state may levy ad valo-rem taxes is determined by state law. Neither the Import-Export Clause nor the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution is implicated.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.