“Failing to direct this Court to specific portions of the record in support of an argument violates Pa.R.A.P. 2119(c) [and for] that reason alone, we could conclude this issue is waived.”
How later courts described this case
- “Failing to direct this Court to specific portions of the record in support of an argument violates Pa.R.A.P. 2119(c) [and for] that reason alone, we could conclude this issue is waived.”
- finding evidentiary error harmless where there was overwhelming evidence of guilt
- a claim is waived for failure to direct this Court's attention to that part of the record substantiating his claim
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
CONCURRING OPINION BY
LAZARUS, J.:
I concur with the result reached by the Majority based upon the meticulous opinion authored by my colleague, Judge Mun-dy. In her decision, she adeptly sets forth the quantum of evidence which is necessary to overcome the prejudice from the *1120 victim’s letter, which is clearly hearsay, and make its admission harmless error.