Opinion

Trimmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

  • 905 A.2d 913
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Aug 3, 2006
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.6%

holding that determination of facts and credibility are solely within the province of the Workers’ Compensation Judge

How later courts described this case

  • holding that determination of facts and credibility are solely within the province of the Workers’ Compensation Judge

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*914

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. Additionally, as this Court finds that the Commonwealth Court substituted its determination of the facts of this matter and the credibility of the witnesses for the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s proper assessments, the judgment of the Commonwealth Court is reversed, and the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Judge as affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board is reinstated. See Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Skirpan), 531 Pa. 287 , 612 A.2d 434 (1992) (holding that determination of facts and credibility are solely within the province of the Workers’ Compensation Judge).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.