Opinion

Kaolin Mushroom Farms, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

  • 669 A.2d 438
  • 1995 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 591
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 22, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Lord
On the bench
Friedman, Lord, Newman
Cited by
5 cases

unilateral change in base wage, overtime pay and product packaging methods

How later courts described this case

  • unilateral change in base wage, overtime pay and product packaging methods

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LORD, Senior Judge,

concurring.

I concur. I thoroughly agree with the majority opinion in all but one respect.

While a reduction of ten percent in wages may not be substantial in some instances, and while there is admittedly language in Steinberg Vision Associates noting that “a 14.2% wage reduction is at the cusp,” of having a substantial impact, I cannot agree that a ten percent reduction in the wages of a mushroom picker making $6 per hour is not a substantial reduction. I cannot accept the notion of a percentage-based “cusp” because I am convinced that the percentage varies with the wage — the less the wages, the more impact any percentage reduction has.

FRIEDMAN, J., joins in this concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.