Opinion

Airport Cab Co. v. Rucker Lumber Co.

  • 174 A.2d 198
  • 1961 D.C. App. LEXIS 321
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 20, 1961
Status
Published
Author
Smith
On the bench
Hood, Municipal, Quinn, Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.3%

The opinion

SMITH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment against Airport Cab Company arising out of a collision between two vehicles on 15th Street between Eye and K Streets, west of McPherson Park. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to find appellee negligent or contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

The accident occurred about 6:30 p. m. Appellee’s driver, who had been heading south on 15th Street, testified that he stopped his car midway in the 'block and three or four feet from the west curb; that after looking in both directions and seeing no cars approaching he proceeded to make a U turn; and that he did not look south again until he reached the center of 15th Street, at which time he observed appellant’s taxicab heading north on 15th Street about 20-25 feet away. Appellant’s driver testified that he was proceeding north on 15th Street at approximately 20-22 miles per hour in the center lane; that traffic was moving in the southbound lanes; and that he first saw appellee’s vehicle when it was 20 feet away. The collision occurred in the lane next to the center of the street on the northbound side.

Ordinarily the determination of negligence or contributory negligence presents a question of fact. Where it is clear from undisputed evidence that, conceding every legitimate inference, but one reasonable conclusion may be drawn, the issue is one of law for the court. Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296 . Here the trial judge, sitting without a jury as the trier of fact, determined the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded their testimony. We cannot say that his finding is manifestly wrong or without evidence to support it. 1 Accordingly, the judgment will be

Affirmed.

. Code 1951, § 11-772. See also Royal Home Equipment Co. v. Lucian, D.C.Mun. App., 158 A.2d 327 ; Blitz v. Hobbs, D.C. Mun.App., 160 A.2d 803 ; Palmer v. Henry, D.C.Mun.App., 167 A.2d 799 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.