Opinion

East v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic

  • 150 A.2d 633
  • 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 253
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
May 1, 1959
Status
Published
On the bench
Hood, Quinn, Rover
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 67.3%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, as the result of his conviction of various moving traffic violations, accumu *634 lated over twelve points” and after due administrative proceedings his operator’s permit was revoked. 1

All of the questions raised by petitioner in his appeal have heretofore been decided by this court adversely to his contentions. 2

Affirmed.

. See Part V, Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations.

. See Glenn v. Commissioners of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 146 A.2d 575 ; Tillman v. Director of Vehicles, etc., D.C.Mun.App., 144 A.2d 922 ; Daniels v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 143 A.2d 95 ; Ritch v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 124 A.2d 301 ; Lambert v. Board of Com’rs of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 116 A.2d 926 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.