Opinion

State v. Berube

  • 139 Me. 11
  • 26 A.2d 654
  • 1942 Me. LEXIS 27
Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Filed
May 9, 1942
Status
Published
Author
Worster
On the bench
Hudson, Manser, Murchie, Sturgis, Thaxter, Worster
Cited by
10 cases

evidence of prior acts similar to the charged offense admissible to show relationship between parties in prosecution for indecent liberties with a minor

How later courts described this case

  • evidence of prior acts similar to the charged offense admissible to show relationship between parties in prosecution for indecent liberties with a minor

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Worster, J.,

dissenting. I am unable to concur in the majority opinion.

The respondent was required to answer, over his objection, and subject to his exception, the following question:

“Do you remember telling the Chief of Police you had little girls go up there and you paid them twenty-five cents, fifty cents and a dollar?”

As I view it, this question was inadmissible, and highly prejudicial, and its admission was not rendered harmless by the respondent’s answer or by any other testimony disclosed by the record.

Exception sustained.

Hudson, J., dissenting. I concur in the dissent of Mr. Justice Worster.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.