stating “the importance of making a clear record to allow proper review of speedy-trial claims”
How later courts described this case
- stating “the importance of making a clear record to allow proper review of speedy-trial claims”
- "A defendant cannot complain on appeal of alleged errors [that he] invited or induced ...."
- as of 2013, "[t]he United States Supreme Court has not decided whether Biggers applies to an in-court identification not preceded by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification"
- "A defendant cannot complain on appeal of alleged errors invited or induced by himself."
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
CHANDLER, Justice,
concurring in part and in result:
¶ 253. I concur in part and in the result. I write separately to express my agreement with the analysis of the Confronta *683 tion Clause issue provided by Justice Kitchens in his dissenting opinion.
DICKINSON, P.J., AND KITCHENS, J., JOIN THIS OPINION IN PART.