Opinion

Clark v. Melson

  • 82 Fla. 230
  • 89 So. 495
  • 1921 Fla. LEXIS 450
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Aug 15, 1921
Status
Published
On the bench
Brówne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 77.6%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Taylor and Whitfield, J. J., concur.

*231 West, J., specially concurs.

Brówne, C. J., and Ellis, J., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.