Opinion

Woodruff v. State

  • 145 Tex. Crim. 324
  • 167 S.W.2d 769
  • 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 572
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Dec 9, 1942
Status
Published
Author
Beauchamp
On the bench
Beauchamp, Graves
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in which he insists that we were in error in not sustaining his bills of exception based on admission of testimony relating to labels on the bottles.

*328 The proposition of law stated and the authorities cited will be sustained under proper statement of facts. We have reconsidered the record before us and are thoroughly settled in the view adequately expressed in the original opinion. As therein set out, it is definitely shown by evidence uncontradicted that the labels gave the information that the contents was whisky. The evidence objected to went no further than did that which was not objected to, consequently appellant is in no position to complain of the error.

Motion for rehearing is overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.