Opinion

Kuechler v. Wright

  • 40 Tex. 600
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 1, 1874
Status
Published
Author
Reeves
On the bench
Devine, Evans, Gould, McAdoo, Reeves
Cited by
17 cases

making a similar observation and responding to Justice Moore’s concurring opinion

How later courts described this case

  • making a similar observation and responding to Justice Moore’s concurring opinion

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Reeves, Associate Justice.

I concur in overruling the motion for rehearing and that the judgment of the District Court should be reversed because the lands were not subject to location and survey. My opinion is not based on any want of jurisdiction of the District Court to award the writ of mandamus against the Commissioner of the Land Office in a proper case. I refer to my dissenting opinion in the case of Bledsoe v. The International Railroad Company for my views on this question, and concur generally with Justice Moore in his opinion in the present case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.