Opinion

Larry Brown v. Steve Secrest Tom Ellis Chris Erhardt Pat Brown-Lindsey Ralph Lindsey Bertha Lindsey Russell Willis

  • 818 F.2d 866
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6520
  • 1987 WL 35992
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
May 20, 1987
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

818 F.2d 866

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Larry BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Steve SECREST; Tom Ellis; Chris Erhardt; Pat

Brown-Lindsey; Ralph Lindsey; Bertha Lindsey;

Russell Willis, Defendants-Appellees

No. 86-3362.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 20, 1987.

Before JONES, NELSON and RYAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Upon examination of the record and briefs, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not necessary in this appeal. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

Plaintiff initiated this civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. Sec.1983 complaining of a 1980 burglary of his residence by the seven named defendants. The district court ultimately dismissed the case for lack of prosecution on the authority of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b). This appeal followed. On appeal, the parties have briefed the issues.

3

Upon consideration, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order of December 13, 1985. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.