Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 95 So. 3d 323
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11686
  • 2012 WL 2913235
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Jul 18, 2012
Status
Published
On the bench
Ciklin, Levine, Polen
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.0%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant is cautioned against the filing of future motions, petitions or appeals in this court which raise the same sentencing challenges as presented here, in that some of the claims were raised and rejected in previous motions and appeals. Such future attempts will result in referral to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary sanctions which may include forfeiture of gain time, see § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2011), and issuance of an order to show cause why further sanctions barring pro se filings should not also be instituted under State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48-19 (Fla.1999).

POLEN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.