Opinion

University of Miami v. Exposito ex rel. Gonzales

  • 87 So. 3d 803
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6544
  • 2012 WL 1448963
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Apr 27, 2012
Status
Published
Author
Schwartz
On the bench
Emas, Ramirez, Schwartz
Cited by
3 cases

“[T]he ALJ’s determination of compensability serves as a threshold issue for any person who wishes to pursue a NICA claim; likewise, the ALJ’s determination of non-compensability is a threshold issue for any person who wishes to pursue a civil action in circuit court.”

How later courts described this case

  • “[T]he ALJ’s determination of compensability serves as a threshold issue for any person who wishes to pursue a NICA claim; likewise, the ALJ’s determination of non-compensability is a threshold issue for any person who wishes to pursue a civil action in circuit court.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge

(specially

concurring).

As evidenced by the fact that we have, by separate orders, granted the appellee’s motions for assessment of attorney’s fees against appellants as a sanction under Section 57.105, Fla. Stat., and Rule 9.410, Fla. RApp. P., this case is wasteful and frivolous in the extreme. I believe that it deserves only a quiet interment in the form of a PCA.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.