“the workers compensation regime represents a quid pro quo compromise of interests, whereby ‘the employee received] an absolute right to recover limited benefits in exchange for the employer’s tort immunity.’ ”
How later courts described this case
- “the workers compensation regime represents a quid pro quo compromise of interests, whereby ‘the employee received] an absolute right to recover limited benefits in exchange for the employer’s tort immunity.’ ”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
WEIMER, J.,
concurring.
|,I concur. The employer’s writ application was granted to address the award of medical expenses in this matter. Rather than recalling and denying the writ with respect to the employer’s assignments of error that were not addressed in the opinion, I think it is more appropriate to simply pretermit those issues.