observing that “[t]he date on which prescription begins to run is a factual issue to be determined by the trier of fact”
How later courts described this case
- observing that “[t]he date on which prescription begins to run is a factual issue to be determined by the trier of fact”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
McCLENDON, J.,
concurs and assigns reasons.
hi agree with the majority’s analysis regarding its discussion of Civil Code Article 2493. Thus, I find it unnecessary to address the issue of contra non valentem. Accordingly, I respectfully concur.