Opinion

Lane v. State

66 So. 3d 812
2009 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 164
2009 WL 4980318

Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Filed: Dec 18, 2009
Status: Published
Author: Main
On the bench: Kellum, Main, Opinions, Welch, Windom, Wise
Cited by: 2 cases

The opinion

MAIN, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the overruling of the application for a rehearing filed by Carlton Reashard Lane. However, for the reasons stated in my writing on original submission, I continue to disagree with the propriety of instructing the trial court to re-sentence Lane. Therefore, I dissent as to the overruling of the State’s application for a rehearing. •

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.