Opinion

State v. Harris

  • 58 So. 3d 408
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5459
  • 2011 WL 1414758
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Apr 14, 2011
Status
Published
Author
Benton
On the bench
Benton, Clark, Padovano
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.8%

holding suppression was not warranted under good faith exception to exclusionary rule where vehicle search was conducted prior to issuance of Gant

How later courts described this case

  • holding suppression was not warranted under good faith exception to exclusionary rule where vehicle search was conducted prior to issuance of Gant
  • certifying question: "Does the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule apply to evidence seized by the police in contravention of [ ] Gant, []?"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BENTON, C.J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment below. The trial court’s decision is consonant with the view of the majority in Arizona v. Gant, — U.S. —, —, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 1723 , 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (U.S.2009), that where “it is clear that a practice is unlawful, individuals’ interest in its discontinuance clearly outweighs any law enforcement ‘entitlement’ to its persistence.”

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.