Opinion

Kimarlo Ragland v. NC State Board of Education

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 23, 2021
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1080

KIMARLO ANTONIO RAGLAND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; WILLIAM W. COBEY,

JR., individually and in their representative capacity; AL COLLINS, individually

and in their representative capacity; DAN FOREST, individually and in their

representative capacity; JANET COWELL, individually and in their representative

capacity; REBECCA TAYLOR, individually and in their representative capacity;

REGINALD KENAN, individually and in their representative capacity; KEVIN

HOWELL, individually and in their representative capacity; OLIVIA HOLMES

OXENDINE, individually and their representative capacity; GREGORY ALCORN,

individually and in their representative capacity; WAYNE MCDEVITT, individually

and in their representative capacity; PATRICIA J. WILLOUGHBY, individually and

in their representative capacity; ERIC DAVIS, individually and in their

representative capacity; JUNE ATKINSON, Superintendent,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00288-FL)

Submitted: August 19, 2021 Decided: August 23, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kimarlo Antonio Ragland, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Kimarlo Antonio Ragland appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to

reopen his civil suit. Having reviewed the record and finding no reversible error, we affirm.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.