Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 226 So. 3d 376
  • 2017 WL 4103218
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Sep 18, 2017
Status
Published
Author
Curium
On the bench
Curium, Lambert, Palmer, Wallis
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.6%

The opinion

PER CURIUM. In ■ this Anders 1 ■ appeal, Jarmal N. Brown (the defendant) appeals his judgment and sentence. We affirm because the defendant pled no contest and his sentence is legal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). However, the judgment contains a scrivener’s error that must be corrected.

The defendant pled no contest to two offenses, including burglary- of an occupied structure under section 810.02(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2016),, but his judgment reflects a conviction for burglary of an occupied structure under section 810.02(3)(d). Accordingly,- we remand for correction of the judgment to reflect the defendant’s actual conviction. See Johnson v. State, 84 So.3d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR.

PALMER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.