Opinion

Eames v. Schedler

2016 La.App. 1 Cir. 1054
199 So. 3d 1170
2016 La. App. LEXIS 1567
2016 WL 4240010

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed: Aug 11, 2016
Status: Published
Author: Crain
On the bench: Chutz, Crain, Drake, Guidry, Higginbotham, Holdridge, McClendon, McDonald, Pettigrew, Theriot, Welch, Whipple
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

CRAIN, J.,

concurring in the result.

hi concur in affirming the judgment of the district court. Louisiana Revised Statute 18:463(A)(2)(a)(v) requires a candidate to acknowledge both that he is subject to the CFDA and has no outstanding fines, fees, or penalties pursuant to the CFDA. I interpret the statute to unambiguously exclude U.S. congressional candidates. Because Cutno is a congressional candidate, not subject to the CFDA, he is not required to acknowledge that he has no outstanding fines, fees, or penalties. Accordingly, I concur in the result reached by the majority.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.