noting that “a potential juror’s view on the death penalty may constitute a race-neutral reason for a peremptory strike” and that the “lack of response to questions can be a race-neutral reason for striking a prospective juror”
How later courts described this case
- noting that “a potential juror’s view on the death penalty may constitute a race-neutral reason for a peremptory strike” and that the “lack of response to questions can be a race-neutral reason for striking a prospective juror”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
KELLUM, Judge,
concurring in part and concurring in the result.
I concur in all parts of the main opinion except Part III. As to that part, I concur only in the result.