Opinion

Hometown Home Health Care of Shelby County, LLC v. State Health Planning & Development Agency

  • 190 So. 3d 44
  • 2015 WL 4600869
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Jul 31, 2015
Status
Published
Author
Thomas
On the bench
Donaldson, Moore, Pittman, Thomas, Thompson
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

THOMAS, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur in the main opinion. I write specially to again urge the legislature to consider repealing the legislation creating the State Health Planning and Development Agency (“the SHPDA”) and requiring health-care institutions to seek certificates of need (“CONs”). As I stated in my opinion concurring specially in Health South of Alabama, LLC v. Shelby Ridge Acquisition Corp., [Ms. 2120872, June 12, 2015] — So.3d -, - (Ala.Civ.App. 2015) (Thomas, J., concurring specially), in my opinion, the SHPDA and the CON system fail to ensure that the State Health Plan meets its goal of assuring that the residents of this state receive quality health care at a reasonable cost, see Ala. Code 1975, § 22-21-260(13) (defining “State Health Plan”), and “competing applicants for CONs spéñd years battling in the court system, which prevents the provision of needed services, and, most assuredly, increases the overall cost of health services Jo fund the protracted legal battles.”

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.