holding that, in the prosecution for capital murder, admission of testimony that defendant had assaulted son was reversible error
How later courts described this case
- holding that, in the prosecution for capital murder, admission of testimony that defendant had assaulted son was reversible error
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
WINDOM, Presiding Judge,
dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my special writing in R.C.W. v. State, 168 So.3d 90, *133 99-102 (Ala.Crim.App.2012), I respectfully dissent.