Opinion

Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Bodin

  • 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 248
  • 154 So. 3d 713
  • 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2851
  • 2014 WL 6676239
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Nov 26, 2014
Status
Published
Author
Amy
On the bench
Amy, Conery, Cooks, Genovese, Peters
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.3%

The opinion

AMY, J.,

dissenting.

|,1 respectfully dissent from the majority opinion as I would affirm the trial court’s ruling on the exception of res judicata in light of Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Bodin, 12-355 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/7/12) , 107 So.3d 699 , writ not considered, 13-251 (La.3/8/13), 109 So.3d 353 . Given the broad language of the receipt and release agreement, as discussed in that underlying appeal, I find no distinction between the earlier proceeding and this matter brought against the defendant in his individual capacity.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.