comparing La. R.S. 22:2 et seq with La. Const. art. V, § 1
How later courts described this case
- comparing La. R.S. 22:2 et seq with La. Const. art. V, § 1
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
WHIPPLE, C.J.,
concurring.
Ill respectfully concur in the result, which is legally correct. However, for the reasons set forth in Judge Pettigrew’s concurring opinion in Reinhardt, I again find that this is a matter that cries out for and warrants legislative action to protect the public from a virtually useless “insurance” policy. See Reinhardt v. Barger, 2007-2363 (La.App. 1st Cir.4/29/09), 15 So.3d 122, 125-129 , writ denied, 2009-1786 (La.11/20/09), 25 So.3d 811 .