Opinion

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission

  • 242 La. 24
  • 134 So. 2d 61
  • 1961 La. LEXIS 614
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
May 29, 1961
Status
Published
Author
Hamlin
On the bench
Fournet, Hamiter, Hamlin, Reasons, Sanders, Summers, Will
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

HAMLIN, Justice

(dissenting).

The majority opinion on this rehearing answers the allegations of error assigned by Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company - to the original opinion of this Court and concludes that they are without merit. It discusses certain findings which plaintiff asserts are erroneous.

When the original opinion of this Court was handed down, I respectfully dissented, setting forth in detail my grounds therefor. A reading of the majority opinion on this rehearing has not changed my initial views. I, therefore, respectfully dissent from the majority opinion on rehearing for the same reasons expressed in my original dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.