Opinion

James E. Brown v. Federal Correctional Institution

  • 798 F.2d 468
  • 1986 WL 17179
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Jun 2, 1986
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.1%

The opinion

798 F.2d 468

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

James E. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-5297.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 2, 1986.

Before JONES, CONTIE and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This matter is before the Court for consideration of appellant's response to this Court's order of April 29, 1986, to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed.

2

In October 29, 1985, the district court entered a judgment which dismissed appellant's complaint of October 15, 1985, in this prisoner civil rights action. On November 4, 1985, the appellant filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The appellant filed his notice of appeal from the district court judgment on December 31, 1985. The district court denied the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on March 6, 1986.

3

Absent any time tolling motions, the notice of appeal was due December 30, 1985. Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. If the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is construed as a motion under Rule 59, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the notice of appeal is premature. Rule 4(a)(4); Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56 (1982). If the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is construed as a motion under Rule 60, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the time for filing the notice of appeal would not be tolled and the appeal is one day late. Rule 4(a)(4); Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983).

4

In his response to show cause order, appellant fails to establish that this appeal should not be dismissed. Therefore, it is ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed as jurisdictionally defective.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.