Opinion

Vanhorn v. Nestoss

  • 99 Wash. 328
  • 169 P. 807
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 9, 1918
Status
Published
Author
Parker
On the bench
Main, Parker
Cited by
7 cases

The opinion

Parker, J.

(dissenting)—I am unable to concur in the view entertained by my brethren in the foregoing opinion that the superior court was without jurisdiction because it did not require the guardian to give a bond upon his appointment. The court may have erred in failing to require such bond, and it may have also abused its discretion in failing to require of the guardian a bond upon the granting of the order of sale, but I think these errors did not constitute such irregularities as to prevent the court having jurisdiction over the estate, in view of the provisions of Rem. Code, 11693, quoted in the opinion.

I therefore dissent.

Mount, J., concurs with Parker, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.