Opinion

State v. Fisher

  • 185 Wash. 2d 836
  • 374 P.3d 1185
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 7, 2016
Status
Published
Author
Stephens
On the bench
Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins
Cited by
55 cases

failure to instruct the jury on the defendant’s theory of the case when there was evidence to support that theory is reversible error

How later courts described this case

  • failure to instruct the jury on the defendant’s theory of the case when there was evidence to support that theory is reversible error
  • stating rule for self-defense
  • a defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on any theory of the case that is supported by the evidence
  • second bracket in original

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Stephens, J.

¶30 (concurring in part and dissenting in part) — I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm Corey Trosclair’s conviction based on its conclusion that the violation of Trosclair’s confrontation clause rights was harmless error.

¶31 As to codefendant, Kisha Fisher, I agree with Justice González that the trial court properly rejected her proposed affirmative defense instruction. Accordingly, I would also affirm Fisher’s conviction.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.