Opinion

United States v. Hoffman

154 Wash. 2d 730

Court: Washington Supreme Court
Filed: Jul 28, 2005
Status: Published
Author: Johnson
On the bench: Alexander, Baker, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Sanders, Tern
Cited by: 39 cases

amicus briefs must comply with RAP 10.3

How later courts described this case

amicus briefs must comply with RAP 10.3

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

¶26 (concurring) — With the exception of footnote 3 striking one amicus brief, I concur in the majority opinion.

J.M. Johnson, J.

¶27 In this matter of widespread public interest and importance, I do not believe it is in the interests of informed judicial decision making to strike and refuse to even consider the arguments of one (of many) groups previously granted amicus status.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.