holding that imposition of impact fees as a condition for the issuance of a building permit is a land use decision
How later courts described this case
- holding that imposition of impact fees as a condition for the issuance of a building permit is a land use decision
- holding that the imposition of impact fees as a condition on a building permit was unreviewable absent a timely challenge to the permit
- recognizing that the Land Use Petition Act, RCW 36.70C.030(1) establishes uniform procedures by its own terms and is the exclusive means of land use decisions
- holding that the imposition of impact fees as a condition on the issuance of a building permits was a land use decision subject to LUPA
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
¶51 (concurring in dissent) — I concur with the dissent in result, but only as to those developers who paid under protest.
Chambers, J.,
Reconsideration denied November 2, 2005.