Opinion

Victoria Peterson v. North Carolina State Board of

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jul 22, 2021
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1095

VICTORIA PETERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DURHAM COUNTY

BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ALEJANDRA JAVIERA CABALLERO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-00260-TDS-JLW)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victoria Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Willie Samuel Darby, DURHAM COUNTY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victoria Peterson appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting

Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing her civil complaint for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peterson v. N.C. State

Bd. of Elections, No. 1:20-cv-00260-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2020). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.