Opinion

Alicia Gonzales v. Marshall University Board

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Dec 1, 2020
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1928

ALICIA GONZALES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at

Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:18-cv-00235)

Submitted: November 16, 2020 Decided: December 1, 2020

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amy C. Crossan, BOUCHILLON, CROSSAN & COLBURN, LC, Huntington, West

Virginia, for Appellant. Perry W. Oxley, David E. Rich, Eric D. Salyers, OXLEY RICH

SAMMONS, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alicia Gonzales appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in

favor of the Marshall University Board of Governors on Gonzales’ complaint under Title

IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Gonzales v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors, No. 3:18-cv-00235 (S.D.W.

Va. July 30, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.