Opinion

Albert McLoon & Co. v. Commissioner

  • 1 B.T.A. 637
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2851
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Feb 27, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
Jabíes, Teussell, Steenhagen, Tbammele
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.3%

The opinion

Appeal of ALBERT C. McLOON & CO.

Albert McLoon & Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 318.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

1 B.T.A. 637 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2851 ;

February 27, 1925 , decided Submitted January 26, 1925 .

*2851 H. M. Pero, Esq., for the taxpayer.

Robert A. Littleton, Esq. (Nelson T. Hartson, Solicitor of Internal Revenue) for the Commissioner.

*637 Before JAMES, STERNHAGEN, TRAMMELL, and TRUSSELL.

This appeal was on the calendar for hearing on December 10, 1924, at which time the taxpayer was represented by counsel, and, after a conference between counsel for the taxpayer and the Commissioner, a continuance was order until January 26, 1925. When the appeal was called for hearing on January 26, 1925, no one appeared to represent the taxpayer.

The taxpayer appealed from a Commissioner's deficiency letter proposing to assess an additional tax for a fiscal year ended March 31, 1920, in the amount of $820.21, and the petition set forth that the appeal was predicated upon the rejection by the Commissioner of (a) depreciation deduction in the sum of $1,956.50, and (b) the reduction of invested capital in the sum of $8,750 on account of dividends paid during the taxable year; the petition alleging that *638 such dividends had been paid at the very end of the taxable period and not at the beginning.

At the hearing on January 26, the Commissioner's counsel conceded *2852 that the taxpayer's claimed deduction on account of depreciation in the amount of $1,956.50 should have been allowed by the Commissioner and that its rejection was an error, and this concession was read into the record of the appeal.

The taxpayer's allegation with reference to the time when dividends were paid stands of record as denied by the Commissioner and unsupported by any proof on the part of the taxpayer.

DECISION.

The deficiency in tax must be recomputed by the allowance to the taxpayer of the deduction for depreciation in the amount as originally claimed and conceded by the Commissioner. The final decision will be settled on consent or on 10 days' notice in accordance with Rule 50.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.