Opinion

Simmons v. Commissioner

  • 17 B.T.A. 873
  • 1929 BTA LEXIS 2224
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Oct 11, 1929
Status
Published
On the bench
Teammell
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.9%

The opinion

W. H. SIMMONS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Simmons v. Commissioner

Docket No. 10167.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

17 B.T.A. 873 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2224 ;

October 11, 1929 , Promulgated

*2224 Action of the respondent in disallowing a deduction for an alleged bad debt approved.

W. H. Simmons pro se.

T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

TRAMMELL

*873 OPINION.

TRAMMELL: This proceeding is for the redetermination of a deficiency in income tax of $371.31 for 1920, resulting from the respondent's refusal to allow as a deduction an amount of $1,090 claimed by the petitioner in his income-tax return on account of a debt alleged to have been ascertained to have become worthless.

About 1909 the petitioner orally leased for a yearly rental of about $500 a small tobacco house and certain land located in Hopkinsville, *874 Ky., to R. E. Cooper of that place. The petitioner and Cooper at that time were close friends and had been in business together for 20 years. Cooper desired the property for the use of his brother. The house was occupied for two or three years, for which time the petitioner computed the rental to be $1,090. Cooper became financially involved during the war and was "hard rpessed," and the petitioner was lenient with him. The petitioner carried the debt along until after the war when he asked Cooper to pay *2225 it. Cooper refused to make payment on the ground that he did not owe it. The petitioner considered that the alleged debt was uncollectible and took the amount as a deduction in his income tax return for 1920. The last time the petitioner saw Cooper he told the petitioner that he (Cooper) "had all the money he needed, and was not interested in making any further money." The petitioner did not keep any books of account.

On the facts before us, we are unable to find that the respondent erred in disallowing the deduction, and his action is accordingly approved.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.