Opinion

Vanco Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner

  • 12 B.T.A. 557
  • 1928 BTA LEXIS 3505
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Jun 13, 1928
Status
Published
On the bench
Siefkin
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.9%

The opinion

VANCO MILLS, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Vanco Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 13276.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

12 B.T.A. 557 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3505 ;

June 13, 1928 , Promulgated

*3505 Petitioner's inventory approved.

J. H. Bridgers, Esq., for the petitioner.

T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

SIEFKIN

*557 SIEFKIN: This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in income tax for the year 1920 of $702.77. The only issue is as to the valuation of inventory. The petitioner is a North Carolina corporation with principal offices at Henderson. Its closing inventory on December 31, 1920, was taken personally by its president at the market price, obtained from quotations received on the date of inventory for all grain from Chicago and other grain markets and current quotations on supplies that did not fluctuate. The market price of the inventory of the petitioner as determined by its president was $6,221 less than the cost of $39,669.32. The market price as determined was used by the petitioner in its closing inventory for 1920 in its income-tax return for that year. The same method of pricing inventory was used in the opening inventory for 1920, and had been used in prior years, the pricing having been done by the same individual who took and priced the inventory at the end of 1920. *3506 The respondent, in computing the deficiency involved here, determined that the closing inventory should be priced at $39,669.32, the cost. We are satisfied that his action was erroneous and resulted from an entry upon the minute books of the petitioner which was satisfactorily explained at the hearing. The long continued consistent method adopted by the petitioner satisfied the requirements of the statute and the regulations and, we believe, correctly reflected its income. See .

Judgment of no deficiency will be entered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.