Opinion

Winsor & Jerauld Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

  • 2 B.T.A. 22
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2578
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Jun 10, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
James, Littleton, Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.7%

The opinion

APPEAL OF WINSOR & JERAULD MANUFACTURING CO.

Winsor & Jerauld Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1900.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

2 B.T.A. 22 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2578 ;

June 10, 1925 , Decided Submitted May 15, 1925 .

*2578 Frank C. Lawton for the taxpayer.

Ellis, W. Manning, Esq., for the Commissioner.

*22 Before JAMES, LITTLETON, and SMITH.

This is an appeal from a determination of a deficiency in income tax for the year 1919, amounting to $786.11.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

The taxpayer is a Maine corporation, with its principal office in Providence, R.I. It was organized in the year 1900 with a capital stock of $50,000.

At that time the capital stock of the corporation was issued in the amount of $30,100 for two patents theretofore issued by the Patent Office, and the remainder of the capital stock was paid for in cash.

The patents in question expired in the years 1915 and 1916, and, prior to that time, were written off the books of the corporation. Notwithstanding the expiration of the patents, they have continued to be the basis of the taxpayer's business, due to the fact that the appliances manufactured under them required specialized knowledge in their manufacture, and, for the taxable years here in question, and, indeed, to the present time, these appliances have not been successfully manufactured by competitors.

In making its income-tax return for the taxable *2579 year 1919, the taxpayer restored to invested capital the sum of $30,100, the original cost of the patents, less depreciation for certain years subsequent to 1916, and claimed as actual invested capital for the taxable year the sum of $20,331.50 as the value of the patents for that year, subject to inclusion in invested capital. The Commissioner, in the audit *23 of the taxpayer's return, denied invested capital in this amount and asserted a deficiency, and from the deficiency so asserted the taxpayer brings this appeal.

DECISION.

The determination of the Commissioner is approved. ; .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.