Opinion

Washington Whip Co. v. Commissioner

  • 17 B.T.A. 1221
  • 1929 BTA LEXIS 2164
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Nov 5, 1929
Status
Published
On the bench
Aetjndell
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.5%

The opinion

WASHINGTON WHIP CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Washington Whip Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 25381.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

17 B.T.A. 1221 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2164 ;

November 5, 1929 , Promulgated

*2164 Walter Glasser, Esq., for the petitioner.

L. A. Luce, Esq., for the respondent.

ARUNDELL

*1221 OPINION.

ARUNDELL: The respondent has determined deficiencies of $64.65 and $61.86 in income taxes for the years 1922 and 1923, respectively. The error alleged is the respondent's action in determining the taxes on the basis of separate returns.

The petitioner is a New York corporation with its principal office in New York City. It contends in this proceeding that it was affiliated with the Joy Amusement Device Manufacturing Co. and Olentangy Whip Co. during the years 1922 and 1923 and that the three companies should be permitted to file consolidated returns. Petitioner, however, during these years filed separate returns, as did the companies with which it claims to have been affiliated.

In view of the fact that petitioner filed separate returns for the years in question, respondent takes the position that petitioner must *1222 stand by its election and denies the right to report its income on a consolidated basis. We find no error in respondent's ruling. *2165 ; ; and ; affd., .

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.