Opinion

Firststone Heights LLC (1512 Forest Trail Apts) v. Travis Central Appraisal District

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Filed
Oct 28, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.1%

The opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00108-CV

Firststone Heights LLC (1512 Forest Trail Apts), Appellant

v.

Travis Central Appraisal District, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-17-004782, THE HONORABLE SCOTT JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Travis County in a suit

contesting the order of the Appraisal Review Board setting the value of a lot in Austin. Appellant

is Firststone Heights LLC1 and appellee is the Travis County Central Appraisal District (District).

We will reverse the judgment.

Firststone set the case for trial but failed to appear when the case was called. The

District, however, was present and announced ready. In the absence of Firststone, the trial court

proceeded to try the case and rendered judgment fixing the appraised value of the property.

The judgment recited in part, “After considering the pleadings, evidence, and [the District’s]

1

The petition, answer, judgment, motion for new trial, motion for attorney’s fees and

sanctions, and order denying motion for new trial and motion for attorney’s fees and sanctions

refer to appellant as “Firststone.” But appellant’s notice of appeal and brief in this Court style

appellant as “Firestone.” We will follow the usage in the trial court.

arguments, and because [Firststone] failed to appear and present evidence or argument, the Court

rules in favor of [the District].”

Firststone argues that the proper remedy was dismissal of the case. We agree.

When a plaintiff fails to appear and prosecute his case, the trial court cannot try the plaintiff’s

cause of action, and the only remedy is to dismiss the same. Smock v. Fischel, 207 S.W.2d 891,

902 (Tex. 1948); Federal Royalties Co. v. McKnight, 77 S.W.2d 542, 543 (Tex. App.—El Paso

1934, writ ref’d); State v. Herrera, 25 S.W.3d 326, 328 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000, no pet.); see

Chacon v. Jellison, No. 03-02-00072-CV, 2003 WL 1560184, at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 27,

2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (concluding that when plaintiff fails to appear for trial, trial court may

only dismiss plaintiff’s claims without prejudice).

We reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment dismissing Firstone’s

action without prejudice.

__________________________________________

Bob E. Shannon, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Shannon*

Reversed and Rendered

Filed: October 28, 2020

* Before Bob E. Shannon, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.