Opinion

Hayes, Anthony v. Elmington Property Management

  • 2019 TN WC App. 39
Court
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Filed
Sep 3, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Marshall L. Davidson III, David F. Hensley, Timothy W. Conner
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Sep 03, 2019

01:01 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

APPEALS BOARD

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

Anthony Hayes ) Docket No. 2018-08-1204

)

v. ) State File No. 56539-2018

)

Elmington Property Management, et al. )

)

)

Appeal from the Court of Workers’ )

Compensation Claims )

Deana C. Seymour, Judge )

Affirmed and Remanded

In this interlocutory appeal, the employee asserts the trial court erred in denying his

request for temporary disability benefits. In response, the employer asserts that the

employee’s appeal should be dismissed, that the appeal is frivolous, and that the

employee should be required to pay the employer’s attorneys’ fees and costs. We decline

to dismiss the appeal, affirm the trial court’s order, find the employee’s appeal frivolous,

and deny the employer’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs.

Judge Timothy W. Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding

Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined.

Anthony Hayes, Memphis, Tennessee, employee-appellant, pro se

Stephen P. Miller, Memphis, Tennessee, for the employer-appellee, Elmington Property

Management

Memorandum Opinion 1

Anthony Hayes (“Employee”), a resident of Shelby County, Tennessee, suffered a

work-related fall on July 27, 2018, while working for Elmington Property Management

(“Employer”). He alleged injuries to his left knee, left arm, right hand, and head.

Employee’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits was accepted as compensable, and

1

“The Appeals Board may, in an effort to secure a just and speedy determination of matters on appeal and

with the concurrence of all judges, decide an appeal by an abbreviated order or by memorandum opinion,

whichever the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or

complex.” Appeals Bd. Prac. & Proc. § 1.3.

1

he received authorized medical care from Dr. David Deneka, an orthopedic specialist.

On September 17, 2018, Dr. Deneka reported that Employee had reached maximum

medical improvement and would retain no permanent medical impairment associated

with his injuries.

Thereafter, Employee complained he had not received medical treatment for the

neck and back symptoms he related to the fall at work. He filed a petition seeking

additional medical benefits. In addition, because he had been terminated, Employee

sought temporary disability benefits. Following an expedited hearing, the trial court

concluded Employee had offered credible testimony regarding his need for additional

medical treatment for injuries related to the fall. However, the trial court determined

Employee did not present sufficient evidence that would indicate he is likely to prevail at

trial in proving entitlement to temporary disability benefits. As a result, the trial court

ordered Employer to schedule an appointment with Dr. Deneka but denied Employee’s

request for temporary disability benefits. Employee has appealed. Following the filing

of Employee’s notice of appeal, Employer filed a brief that included: (1) a request to

dismiss Employee’s appeal; (2) a request to deem Employee’s appeal frivolous; and (3) a

request for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.

First, Employer argues that Employee’s failure to file a transcript of the expedited

hearing, a joint statement of the evidence, or a brief supports a dismissal of Employee’s

appeal. We previously addressed this issue in Navyac v. Universal Health Services, No.

2015-06-0677, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 17, at *5 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.

App. Bd. Mar. 31, 2016), where we explained that the filing of a transcript or a statement

of the evidence is permissive, not mandatory. We further explained that while our ability

to conduct meaningful appellate review is hindered by such circumstances, that does not

justify a dismissal of the appeal. Id. at *7. We therefore deny Employer’s request to

dismiss the appeal.

Second, in his notice of appeal, Employee complained that he had been “denied

health benefits and temporary disability benefits although injured and cannot work.” Yet,

the trial court ordered Employer to provide additional medical benefits, so Employee has

already been granted the relief he seeks with respect to medical treatment. Moreover,

Employee has not offered any argument on appeal as to how the trial court allegedly

erred in its decision to deny the request for temporary disability benefits. As we noted

above, Employee has not filed a transcript of the expedited hearing and has not filed a

brief on appeal. We must therefore presume the trial court’s factual findings are

supported by the record. Hale v. Prime Pkg. & Label, No. 2015-06-0150, 2015 TN Wrk.

Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *13 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. July 16, 2015).

As we have stated previously, it is not our role to search the record for possible

errors or to formulate Employee’s legal arguments in favor of his position. Cosey v.

Jarden Corp., No. 2017-01-0053, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 3, at *8 (Tenn.

2

Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Jan. 15, 2019). Accordingly, in the absence of any

meaningful argument from Employee as to how the trial court allegedly erred in its

decision to deny temporary disability benefits, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Finally, we find Employee’s appeal to be frivolous because it had “no reasonable

chance of succeeding.” Adkins v. Studsvik, Inc., No. E2014-00444-SC-R3-WC, 2015

Tenn. LEXIS 588, at *30 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel July 21, 2015) (citation omitted).

However, we exercise our discretion on this occasion not to award attorneys’ fees or

other expenses for the frivolous appeal. See Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-22-.04(6)

(2018).

The trial court’s order is affirmed in all respects, and the case is remanded. Costs

on appeal are taxed to Employee.

3

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

Anthony Hayes ) Docket No. 2018-08-1204

)

v. ) State File No. 56539-2018

)

Elmington Property Management, et al. )

)

)

Appeal from the Court of Workers’ )

Compensation Claims )

Deana C. Seymour, Judge )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Appeals Board’s decision in the referenced

case was sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 3rd day

of September, 2019.

Name Certified First Class Via Via Sent to:

Mail Mail Fax Email

Anthony Hayes X General Post Office

555 South 3rd Street

Memphis, TN 38101-9998

Stephen P. Miller X smiller@mckuhn.com

Matthew R. Macaw mmacaw@mckuhn.com

Deana C. Seymour, Judge X Via Electronic Mail

Kenneth M. Switzer, Chief Judge X Via Electronic Mail

Penny Shrum, Clerk, Court of X penny.patterson-shrum@tn.gov

Workers’ Compensation Claims

Olivia Yearwood

Clerk, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board

220 French Landing Dr., Ste. 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243

Telephone: 615-253-1606

Electronic Mail: WCAppeals.Clerk@tn.gov

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.