Opinion

Lara, Israel v. Progress Rail Services Corp.

  • 2019 TN WC App. 32
Court
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Filed
Jul 18, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Marshall L. Davidson III, David F. Hensley, Timothy W. Conner
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.5%

The opinion

FILED

Jul 18, 2019

02:00 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

APPEALS BOARD

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

Israel Lara ) Docket No. 2016-02-0501

)

v. ) State File No. 94197-2015

)

Progress Rail Services Corp., et al. )

)

)

Appeal from the Court of Workers’ )

Compensation Claims )

Brian K. Addington, Judge )

Affirmed and Remanded

In this interlocutory appeal, the employee alleges suffering an injury to his back when a

co-worker dropped a piece of metal the two were carrying. The employee received

authorized medical treatment for his injury but claimed he was entitled to additional

medical treatment and temporary disability benefits. Following an expedited hearing, the

trial court denied the employee’s request for additional medical care and his request for

temporary disability benefits because he provided no evidence he was unable to work as a

result of the work accident. The employee has appealed. We affirm the trial court’s

decision and remand the case.

Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in

which Judge Timothy W. Conner and Judge David F. Hensley joined.

Israel Lara, Johnson City, Tennessee, employee-appellant, pro se

Eric Shen, Brentwood, Tennessee, for the employer-appellee, Progress Rail Services

Corp.

Memorandum Opinion 1

Israel Lara (“Employee”), a resident of Johnson City, Tennessee, worked as a

laborer for Progress Rail Services Corporation (“Employer”). On November 17, 2015,

1

“The Appeals Board may, in an effort to secure a just and speedy determination of matters on appeal and

with the concurrence of all judges, decide an appeal by an abbreviated order or by memorandum opinion,

whichever the Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or complex.”

Appeals Bd. Prac. & Proc. § 1.3.

1

Employee, with the assistance of a co-worker, was lifting a heavy piece of metal onto a

pallet when the co-worker dropped his end, causing Employee to bear the weight of the

entire piece. As a result, Employee claimed to have suffered an injury to his back.

Two days later, Employee was treated at Medical Care, a walk-in clinic. X-rays

indicated he suffered from “[d]egenerative disk space narrowing and very mild chronic

discogenic sclerosis at L5-S1.” Employee was given a work excuse for five days and was

assigned lifting restrictions of ten pounds. He returned to full duty six days after his

injury.

Employee continued to complain of back pain and was referred to Dr. Michael

Wilkinson, a pain management specialist. Dr. Wilkinson administered two injections, but

Employee’s pain persisted. He was then referred to a neurosurgeon, Dr. Jim Brasfield.

After a series of diagnostic tests, Dr. Brasfield reported that Employee’s tests were

normal and placed him at maximum medical improvement. In addition, Dr. Brasfield

reported that Employee “does not have any restrictions in regard to his work injury of

November 17, 2015” and “he may return to his regular work without restrictions.”

Due to Employee’s ongoing complaints of pain and requests for additional

treatment, Employer sent him to Dr. James Burt, another neurosurgeon, for an additional

medical examination. After Dr. Burt reviewed Employee’s records and performed an

examination, he concluded:

It is my best medical opinion [Employee] has not suffered any type of

permanent disability owing to his work events of November 17, 2015.

Therefore, any ongoing complaints that [he] has, I cannot relate to his

November 17, 2015 work event. It is my opinion that [Employee] may

participate in the work force without restrictions with regards to his lumbar

spine.

Thereafter, Employee filed a petition requesting additional medical treatment and

temporary disability benefits. After an expedited hearing, the trial court found that

Employee failed to present sufficient evidence that he was likely to prevail at trial and

denied the requested benefits. The court reasoned that, even though Employee “has pain

that affects his daily life . . . the medical records indicate that he is at MMI, [and] his

current complaints do not relate to the November 17, 2015 incident.” The trial court also

denied Employee’s request for temporary disability benefits because no medical provider

had taken him off work for more than five days.

Employee has appealed. However, he has failed to file a brief, failed to identify

any issues for our review, does not allege any legal errors on the part of the trial court,

and has not made any argument as to why the trial court’s decision should be reversed.

“It is not the role of the courts, trial or appellate, to research or construct a litigant’s case

2

or arguments for him or her.” Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of

Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). Were we to search the record for possible

errors and raise issues and arguments for Employee, we would be acting as his counsel,

which the law prohibits. Webb v. Sherrell, No. E2013-02724-COA-R3-CV, 2015 Tenn.

App. LEXIS 645, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015).

The trial court’s decision is affirmed, and the case is remanded. Costs on appeal

are taxed to Employee.

3

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

Israel Lara ) Docket No. 2016-02-0501

)

v. ) State File No. 94197-2015

)

Progress Rail Services Corp., et al. )

)

)

Appeal from the Court of Workers’ )

Compensation Claims )

Brian K. Addington, Judge )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Appeals Board’s decision in the

referenced case was sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service

on this the 18th day of July, 2019.

Name Certified First Via Fax Via Sent to:

Mail Class Fax Number Email

Mail

Israel Lara X X 3121 W. Walnut St. #2

Johnson City, TN 37604

napomusono08@hotmail.com

Eric Shen X eric.shen@libertymutual.com

Brian Addington, Judge X Via Electronic Mail

Kenneth M. Switzer, Chief Judge X Via Electronic Mail

Penny Shrum, Clerk, Court of X penny.patterson-shrum@tn.gov

Workers’ Compensation Claims

Jeanette Baird

Deputy Clerk, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board

220 French Landing Dr., Ste. 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243

Telephone: 615-253-0064

Electronic Mail: WCAppeals.Clerk@tn.gov

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.